The Amazing Spider-Man 3D review.

Review: 3.5 out of 5.

I have reviewed a track record of superhero films in the past and 2 shows on TV with similar themes. In this day and age, it is cool to watch. Due to economic decline and strict guidelines, this genre may shift ever so closer to budget restraints.

Despite the lackluster Spider-Man 3 of the Sam Raimi series, there was high anticipation for a new Spider-Man film. When I heard they had restarted the franchise with another Director and completely different cast, I slipped from eagerness - curiosity as to know how Marc Webb would bring his own vision of the Web Head to the surface - as well as frustration. I mean does this story really need to be retold? After Spider-Man 4 was cancelled due to creative disputes and no commitment to fulfill the target release date for Sony, a safety measure was in place in case this happened.

Written by James Vanderbilt, Alvin Sargent and Steve Kloves, directed by Webb and produced by Avi Arad, Laura Ziskin and Matt Tolmach for Columbia Pictures. The untold story followed a young Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield) who is trying to find his place in life after his parents Richard and Mary Parker (Campbell Scott and Embeth Davidtz) mysteriously left him as a child. Bitten by a genetically modified spider while he searched in OsCorp Tower for Dr. Curt Connors (Rhys Ifans), he now evolved and found purpose after the fall of his Uncle Ben (Martin Sheen) as Spider-Man and now protects New York City from danger.

Good:

First of all, the 3D is spectacular and appears very real and comes out the screen to astonishing quality. Visually and down to aesthetics, this reboot did exceed some of my expectations. Arguably, the tone was a lot darker in themes and the producers aimed for a Batman Begins feel. Garfield did a great job as Peter Parker/Spider-Man, however, I can't say I love his portrayal. I'll get more into that later. Parker and Gwen Stacy, played by Emma Stone, had a lot of chemistry, perhaps more than even Tobey Maguire's Parker and Kirsten Dunst's Mary Jane Watson in the Raimi Spidey trilogy. The storyline was great, but felt rehashed and was not the best interpretation of the origin story.

Nevertheless, the performances from the rest of the supporting cast was ecstatic. Stone gave a brave, spunky, life to Gwen that can be memorable. Unlike the past female love interests on the screen in this mythology, Stone's Gwen was less of a damsel of distress and more clever and assertive than Bryce Dallas Howard's Gwen. I grew accustomed to the new suit the studio made and was impressed with the stunts and I felt the CGI animation throughout were just as fluid as the previous 2 installments of the last series. Flash Thompson, in this movie, was more brutal and Chris Zylka pulled this off well. In addition, a wise-cracking hero is what had been missing in Raimi's run-through.

Bad:

The Amazing Spider-Man had some good points but the rating only just scratched a half way point between number 3 and 4 out of 5 stars. I was ill at ease by the pacing of the story. It did not deserve the way over 2 hour running time. Garfield did well as the superhero in the leading role but not so great as the character's alter-ego, Parker. I do not like the Emo Parker, I mean you might as well call him out as a Goth. I see they were trying to aim for an Ultimate Spider-Man rendition of the character from an imprint of the comic book series that re-imagined the web-slinger in the 21st century. Good move but not a better enough product with sustenance. 

Another thing is bad about this movie is it lacked drama. Although there were excellent action scenes, there was feelings of emptiness in parts between some of the interaction of the characters. Not that it was down to them being flat, but  it was more the actor's handle of the role. In one instance (SPOILER ALERT) the scene where Uncle Ben is infamously taken down by a lone gun from the supermarket, Garfield's acting was off. The same can be said to another character who sadly (SPOILER ALERT) passed away. An idea of the Lizard being the main villain wasn't bad, with him being an only threat, not good. He would more perfectly fit the role of a henchman. It needed someone other than him from the Marvel universe to fill his shoes and do the job.

Overall:

With a crispy, hot, production thanks to Sony, a firm script, sweet quips and amazing performances from Garfield as Spider-Man, Stone's Gwen and Ifans' portrayal of the slithery Lizard; the reboot had some flaws from the decision process, but it was rigid enough to stun us with great special effects and action scenes. Webb's version neither outshined or backtracked Raimi's version. 


- Written by Kbon

Rise of the Planet of the Apes review.

Review: 4 out of 5.

When I saw that there was going to be another adaptation of Planet of the Apes, I didn't know what to think. I watched the remake in 2001 with Mark Wahlberg and I felt almost like dung was being thrown in my face. Seriously, it was that bad. I flicked through all trailers on TV and decided to go watch only after my friend did who said it was fantastic. I'm not too familiar with the franchise, only after watching it and browsing on the internet, I realized there were many other films made into adaptations of the book by Pierre Boulle in a film series. This movie is more of an origin story or you could say a prequel to the original series from the late 60's and early 70's.

Now a decade since the remake in 2001 was introduced to the general public to a new generation, Rise of the Planet of the Apes is a reboot by 20th Century Fox. The film is directed by Rupert Wyatt. It followed Will Rodman (James Franco), scientist of the pharmaceutical, Gen-Sys. Rodman is trying to develop a cure for Alzheimer's disease and is using a genetically engineered virus on chimpanzees. The virus initially repairs neurons in their brain and then mutates. Bright Eyes (Terry Notary), having given birth to a baby chimp, ran amok in the experiment and caused a ruckus in a board meeting where Rodman presented the cure and is killed. It turned out she was only protecting her baby and after Rodman is told to eradicate all test subjects by Steven Jacobs (David Oyelowo), his boss; Robert Franklin (Tyler Labine), the ape handler, advised that Rodman take care of the baby chimp. Rodman took him home and his father named it Caesar (Andy Serkis).

8 years later, Caesar, inherited by his mother's genes of a high scaled intelligence; now evolved into a human pet. He can communicate with Rodman using sign language. Rodman tests a sample of the cure to his father, Charles (John Lithgow), who is struck with Alzheimer's disease. At first, he improves but his Dementia slowly returned as his immune system fought off the virus. Tortured by gate keepers, in a Primate Sanctuary, by John Landon (Brian Cox) and Dodge (Tom Felton), Caesar rose to power and led the other apes in a revolution against human society and oppression. The uprising has begun.

Good:

One of the best films of 2011, this Ape feature could tussle even Peter Jackson's King Kong all the way to the top. I am pleased with the fact it delivered. It has a rich story which explained a lot of things. It really played well the angle the filmmakers were getting at; the apes high IQ being a result of genetic engineering, the fall of mankind and the ape's rebellion all fit into place. I mean, I couldn't buy extraterrestrials in monkey form, could I? All those favour of Oozaru, don't remind me.

The strengths was the stupendous work on motion capture with all the apes by Chernin Entertainment including Serkis' role of a prodigal, morbid, Caesar, who proved more than just a pet. James Franco nailed the struggling doctor pretty hard and could balance his dramatic interactivity with his relationships between the father, boss, primatologist girlfriend Caroline Aranha, played by Freida Pinto and his companion every bit as tight. His character arc was told very skilfully and Franco knew how to grow aware of something a little out of nature brought into reality. Stepping past the fact he is not speaking with a chimp is not easy to conduct. I commend the majority of the main and supporting cast for their handiwork.

Bad:

Surprisingly it did not have many flaws, if not next to nothing. I only have a problem with the pacing of this magnificent story. It was a snail pace from the beginning but that was minor. At least it wasn't talkative and it was pretty unexpected. In most origin stories, Act 1 is the slowest, but it depends on a lot of factors; the impact of the inciting event or build up towards it and how much the audience want to invest in the characters. If they have a rich background, obviously it will take a while to present it on screen. On the other hand, there are exceptions.

Although the performances from the leading roles equally on the human and chimp races, including stunning visual effects, there was something about it that was missing. I expected more on the delivery. Now, I don't get "too gassed" on movie trailers, but let's be real everyone - we bought tickets (some of us) so that we can enjoy a well spent film, ain't that right? I'm not saying this wasn't but I wanted more in terms of big scale action. Its a revolution in the making, for Christ sake. This is very big since Parallax's attack in Coast City (Green Lantern), at least make it feel like one. Reason I say this is a few scenes from the trailer was missing; one clip from a tree climbing scene was supposed to have Dodge appear looking from below who is scared of the ape plus two other scenes I won't spoil. Another thing I was most disappointed in was the ending was quite weak. Though, it did make sense which wasn't too bad.

Overall:

This review should be 3.5 out of 5, but for astounding performances from James Franco, Andy Serkis and Tom Felton made it 4 stars. Brilliant acting, script, direction; I applaud Rupert Wyatt for his vision in making this film happen. With scrupulous editing or continuity issues during post-production and a less impacted ending it could be a titchy bit more epic. Music by Patrick Doyle complimented the action scenes. The post credit sequence also fit most pieces together in store for any future sequels. If you're into sci-fi or have a love of animals, this is the movie for you. That's it, I'm taking a break from reviewing films. Next up, is Blaze Barnation's mixtape, Barnation World.

- Written by Kbon